I don't apologize for my statements, just that I don't think we've
gained any ground in at least a day and I'm part of that.

On 10/25/07, Sebastian Sastre <ssastre at seaswork.com> wrote:
>
> > Ok, we're getting no where with this.  I apologized to the
> > list for what this thread has turned into, and I'll try to do
> > a better job staying out of this sort of pointless "nu uh",
> > "uh hu!", "nu uh!"
> > discussions in the future.  (if I start it again just warn
> > me!  It's a bit of a weakness of mine).
> >
> You have nothing to apoligize about. Controversy is good when you need to
> agitate the mind a little. IMHO "fencing of arguments" (plz not persons) is
> healthy. Without that we will be frozen in comfort.
>
> Please continue defending your thesis as long as they can survive. This is a
> discussion list. So it is by definition.
>
>         cheers,
>
> Sebastian
>
>
>