Concurrent Futures
Rob Withers
reefedjib at yahoo.com
Wed Oct 31 00:21:00 UTC 2007
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Johnson" <jason.johnson.081 at gmail.com>
To: "The general-purpose Squeak developers list"
<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 1:31 PM
Subject: Re: Concurrent Futures
> On 10/29/07, Rob Withers <reefedjib at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> This is what I am trying to do with SqueakElib. Any old object
>> referenced
>> in the system is an eventual local ref, but the system should handle
>> promises or non-local refs anywhere.
>
> Are you going to make the "vats" Smalltalk processes?
They already are.
> Are you going
> to isolate them from other Smalltalk processes in the same image? If
> so then I will probably have some synergy with that.
I am trying to ensure that objects in one Vat don't get directly manipulated
by objects in other Processes.
Rob
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|