On 8/29/07, Fabio Filasieno <fabio.filasieno at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From a first look at the collection libraries, it seems to me that there is
> a LOT of bloat. Really really a LOT.
> I bet that Ocaml's collections can do the same things with an order of
> magnitude of less of code.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_magnitude

That's quite a bold statement, though at least this time it was
grounded with "I bet".

> and by the way the counter arguments
> were a bit mild or close to non-existent.

....  So "I disagreed with/didn't understand" is the same as "a bit
mild or close to non-existent"?