2007/9/3, Ramon Leon <ramon.leon at allresnet.com>:
> > > Are you saying you don't ever want to see the Smalltalk
> > language grow
> > > beyond its current state?  We have a special operator for
> > cascades to
> > > get at the previous receiver, seems only natural to want
> > one for the
> > > opposite to get at the previous result.  Personally, I can
> > live with
> > > Bert's asPipe solution, however, I think this is a nice language
> > > addition and I'd like to see it added in some form.
> >
> > The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Philippe
>
> As is the road to heaven, were I to believe in such things.

And the road to heaven is more syntax? Java and C# are already taking
this way and C++ is where it leads. I'm not sure that's where we want
Squeak to be heading.

Cheers
Philippe

> Ramon Leon
> http://onsmalltalk.com
>
>
>