Andreas Raab wrote:
> Damien Pollet wrote:
>> (*) just on this point I'd prefer to write something like
>> {[a]. [:x| x b]. [:x | x c]} valueAsChain
>
> Nah. I want to write:
>
>   [a. b. c] piped.
>
> SCNR,
>   - Andreas
>
>
HI Andreas,

How would that evaluate? What is piped where to whom? b piped to a and c 
piped to the result of b piped to a?

See, blocks can do almost everything! Who needs other syntax when we 
have blocks! ;-)

Cheers,

Peter