On 05/09/07, Andreas Raab <andreas.raab at gmx.de> wrote:
> Damien Pollet wrote:
> > (*) just on this point I'd prefer to write something like
> > {[a]. [:x| x b]. [:x | x c]} valueAsChain
>
> Nah. I want to write:
>
>    [a. b. c] piped.

OK, but then please don't call [...] a block. Now it's an expression
sequence, a parse tree, or whatever, but not a closure (or a very
specific one)

If [a.b.c] piped is possible, then [a.b.c] do: [:aStatement|
aStatement value] should be possible to, shouldn't it ?
Or [a.b.c] addStatement: [d]
or [a.b.c] at: 2 put: [e]

-- 
Damien Pollet
type less, do more [ | ] http://typo.cdlm.fasmz.org