Jason Johnson wrote:
> I personally wouldn't want to see Smalltalk get things like the
> implicit self, splitting us further from other Smalltalks and even
> ourselves as we split into the "implicit self" versus "explicit self"
> groups as C++ did, only to decide explicit self was best practices
> after years of fighting about it.
>
>   

"The shoe." No. "The Gourd." ... repeat forever ...

;-)