Quick comparison of two Namespaces proposals

Michael van der Gulik mikevdg at gmail.com
Tue Sep 18 10:44:39 UTC 2007


On 9/18/07, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
>
> On Sep 18, 2007, at 11:55 , Michael van der Gulik wrote:
>
> > self add: Kernel.Array new: 4.
> > self add: Kernel::Array new: 4.
> >
> > What do other people think?
>
> +10 for ::
>
> Though I hope this won't become a bikeshed discussion of syntax, but
> actually result in a Namespace solution getting adopted.


Vote registered.

For the near future, there's no need to adopt namespaces into the official
image. They can be loaded and used alongside standard Squeak objects. In the
far future, if the tools are stable and people find it useful then it would
be great to have them in the image.

Gulik.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20070918/0ab7f5c8/attachment.htm


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list