On 9/18/07, Andrew Tween <amtween at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> >>What I am a bit concerned about is that I've made the BNF grammar more
> >>complex or that I've made it stupid. If a dot/period is followed by
> >>whitespace, it terminates >>the current statement; else it can validly
> be
> >>part of a word or keyword.
>
> Your changes allow the following method to be compiled ...
>     x.y
>        ^42
>
> and then ...
>     1 x.y.
> evaluates to 42, which is probably not what you intended
>

Argh. I saw that too when I cut and paste.

Thanks for pointing it out.

Gulik.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20070918/89fa1b5d/attachment.htm