Squeak Roadmap ...

Igor Stasenko siguctua at gmail.com
Fri Sep 21 21:52:24 UTC 2007


On 21/09/2007, Craig Latta <craig at netjam.org> wrote:
>
> Hi--
>
>  > Seems like this is a can of worms and a lot of people like to see some
>  > major changes happen to the Squeak core image. What is Squeak's
>  > "board" view on this?
>
>       Squeak's board was elected by the community; it doesn't need
> quotation marks around it. :)  I'm a member of the board, and my view is
> that yes, a lot of people would like to see major changes to Squeak,
> many of them contradictory. It is indeed a can of worms.
>
>       Ultimately, any technical decisions the leadership makes will
> upset some significant part of the community. As with many communities,
> this may lead to wildly different decisions as the leadership changes
> over time, as well as growth and attrition in the community itself.
>
>

We can't make happy everyone, but we can try make happy most of
people. (Dont remember who said that).

> -C
>
> --
> Craig Latta
> improvisational musical informaticist
> www.netjam.org
> Smalltalkers do: [:it | All with: Class, (And love: it)]
>
>
>


-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list