Quick comparison of two Namespaces proposals

Michael van der Gulik mikevdg at gmail.com
Sat Sep 22 11:00:38 UTC 2007


On 9/22/07, Jason Johnson <jason.johnson.081 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 9/18/07, Igor Stasenko <siguctua at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Again, discussion downs not to about how namespaces should behave, but
> > to choosing appropriate and  conventional syntax for it. Personally, i
> > don't think its really matters.
> > Please, people, lets focus on more important things, if you don't want
> > to flame this topic, like in previous 'pipe syntax'.
>
> How code looks is important.  If it wasn't then Java wouldn't be the
> current most popular language.
>

ROFL :-D. You can't be serious about that!

Gulik.


-- 
http://people.squeakfoundation.org/person/mikevdg
http://gulik.pbwiki.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20070922/25c78547/attachment.htm


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list