If usability and design principles, Fitts law, etc. are the criteria to
materialize the reorganization, then is a good news. If not, there is an
excellent time to think about putting them in practice. Thousands of eyes
and articulations would silently thank you again and again for making that.

	cheers,

Sebastian Sastre


> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org 
> [mailto:squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] En 
> nombre de Todd Blanchard
> Enviado el: Sábado, 22 de Septiembre de 2007 01:44
> Para: The general-purpose Squeak developers list
> CC: Squeak's User Interface
> Asunto: Re: creating instance variable accessors
> 
> In general - Squeak's menus need reorganizing in a BIG way.
> 
> On Sep 21, 2007, at 9:42 PM, Jimmie Houchin wrote:
> 
> > Todd Blanchard wrote:
> >> Yes, but the feature is inexplicably buried.
> >> Cmd-click in class list pane to get menu that begins with 'browse 
> >> full'
> >> choose 'more...'
> >> on subsequent menu it is the last item 'create inst var accessors'
> > [snip]
> >
> > Thanks Todd,
> >
> > I thought I had looked in that menu. But I guess I missed it.
> >
> > It seems that it would be nice if it were in the Instance Variable 
> > submenu, possible right below the 3. Create accessors for instance 
> > variable we could have 4. Create accessors for instance variables.
> > or if we want to be truly explicit
> > 4. Create accessors for all instance variables.
> >
> >
> > I played with it just now to see if it met my other question with 
> > regard to adding accessors to variables which do not have 
> them and it 
> > did. I even modified one of the existing accessors to see 
> if it would 
> > leave it alone or overwrite it. It did as I had hoped.
> > Beautiful!
> >
> > Thanks again for pointing this out.
> >
> > Jimmie
> >
> 
>