Edgar J. De Cleene wrote:
> Well, surprise me we have a list "Discussion about development of Squeak
> 3.10" <v3dot10 at lists.squeakfoundation.org>, where you, Klaus, Andreas, (not
> remember if Tim) was and never said nothing about this.
> Blaming me for Ralph unknown reasons is unfear.

Indeed. And I never intended to. My criticism wasn't about any release 
in particular, it was aimed at Tim's comment effectively saying that 
problems with the release aren't the board's problems.

Chers,
   - Andreas

> I work , but I don't was the man in charge.
> Send several unanswered  mails to release list, private and here.
> I wish move on, send tentative goals and tentative image for 3.11.
> With Matthew, Craig, Pavel and some more people we still meeting and
> discussing.
> 
> Remember you I was who said to Ralph we should go to 3.8 practices , I
> always said this is the way to go.
> 
>> Unless we magically find that way to have a paid team  etc etc.
> said Tim
> 
> Not bad. 
> You must know in Argentina we have talented unpaid students.
> With the same money ESUG trough away for each (and still I wish see the
> results), you can have a six person team here.
> And I could do for the price to maintain a good reliable mirror here.
> 
>> I'd like to have a pithy solution here, but I need to catch up on some of the
>> context, and I happen to be in the middle of a work-for-pay crunch.  But maybe
>> if we all take more of an "I am 100% responsible" approach to our problems
>> we'll start to get some more clarity about what is needed.
>>
>>     - Dan
> 
> You are the same guy who start all don't you ?
> So I take every word you said about how and start to work.
> If you wish can send a list of troubles addressed by Ken and solutions to
> each.
> 
> To all, read the "Discussion about development of Squeak 3.10"
> <v3dot10 at lists.squeakfoundation.org> post , please.
> 
> Waiting directions....
> 
> Edgar
> 
> 
> 
>