[squeak-dev] ... giving up!

David T. Lewis lewis at mail.msen.com
Tue Apr 8 11:24:48 UTC 2008


On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 09:29:22PM +1200, Simon Guest wrote:
> 
> My observation is that Etoys-3.0 is the place I want to be.  But it's
> simply too hard to get this working with SqueakMap and Monticello.  I
> need those to load OSProcess, so I can get my LatexMorph working.  But
> it's all too hard, and there are too many pitfalls I don't know how to
> negotiate.  I could go back to squeak-3.10 where this stuff works, but
> then I lose the really neat OLPC Etoys stuff.  Sigh.
> 

Hi Simon,

I don't have time right now, but if it would help I'd be happy to
put OSProcess and CommandShell into change sets that you could (hopefully)
load into Etoys-3.0. Or as a workaround you could just file them out
of another Squeak image and file them back in to your Etoys image.

Dave




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list