[squeak-dev] ... giving up!
David T. Lewis
lewis at mail.msen.com
Tue Apr 8 11:24:48 UTC 2008
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 09:29:22PM +1200, Simon Guest wrote:
>
> My observation is that Etoys-3.0 is the place I want to be. But it's
> simply too hard to get this working with SqueakMap and Monticello. I
> need those to load OSProcess, so I can get my LatexMorph working. But
> it's all too hard, and there are too many pitfalls I don't know how to
> negotiate. I could go back to squeak-3.10 where this stuff works, but
> then I lose the really neat OLPC Etoys stuff. Sigh.
>
Hi Simon,
I don't have time right now, but if it would help I'd be happy to
put OSProcess and CommandShell into change sets that you could (hopefully)
load into Etoys-3.0. Or as a workaround you could just file them out
of another Squeak image and file them back in to your Etoys image.
Dave
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|