David T. Lewis wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 09:29:22PM +1200, Simon Guest wrote:
>   
>> My observation is that Etoys-3.0 is the place I want to be.  But it's
>> simply too hard to get this working with SqueakMap and Monticello.  I
>> need those to load OSProcess, so I can get my LatexMorph working.  But
>> it's all too hard, and there are too many pitfalls I don't know how to
>> negotiate.  I could go back to squeak-3.10 where this stuff works, but
>> then I lose the really neat OLPC Etoys stuff.  Sigh.
>>
>>     
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> I don't have time right now, but if it would help I'd be happy to
> put OSProcess and CommandShell into change sets that you could (hopefully)
> load into Etoys-3.0. Or as a workaround you could just file them out
> of another Squeak image and file them back in to your Etoys image.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>   
The OSProcess sar from SqueakMap can be filed into the Etoys-3.0 image 
without problems as far as I can tell.
Just download it and file it in from FileList

Karl