On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Brett Kosinski <fancypantalons at gmail.com>
wrote:

> > That's just a design decision I made.  I felt was would be confusing to
> have
> > version numbers "1" and "1.0" in the same lineage.  When you create a
> > branch, you would make "1.1" based on "1".
>
> Fundamentally, what this illustrates is that these version numbers are
> imminently suitable for internal versioning of a product during
> development, and are more or less akin to, say, SVN revision numbers
> or the like (obviously with more semantics built in), but are wholly
> unsuitable (and were probably never meant to be used) for
> customer-facing version numbers that would be used for marking public
> releases.
>
> Brett.


Correct.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20080409/da43b0e8/attachment.htm