[squeak-dev] Re: 1.0 not a valid VersionNumber?

Andreas Raab andreas.raab at gmx.de
Wed Apr 9 20:35:21 UTC 2008


Stephen Pair wrote:
> Did you actually mean true? (if not, I don't actually get what you're 
> after)...VersionNumber aside, I wonder what you could reasonably infer 
> from answer answer of true given for '1.1.2' < '1.12.3' ...I don't think 
> you could infer that 1.12.3 was published  after 1.1.2 for example.  I 
> don't think you could infer that 1.12.3 includes everything in included 
> in 1.1.2 (i.e. that 1.12.3 is derived from 1.1.2).  About all you could 
> infer is that 1 < 12.

Which is precisely what I was after.

Cheers,
   - Andreas



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list