[squeak-dev] Re: 1.0 not a valid VersionNumber?
Andreas Raab
andreas.raab at gmx.de
Wed Apr 9 20:35:21 UTC 2008
Stephen Pair wrote:
> Did you actually mean true? (if not, I don't actually get what you're
> after)...VersionNumber aside, I wonder what you could reasonably infer
> from answer answer of true given for '1.1.2' < '1.12.3' ...I don't think
> you could infer that 1.12.3 was published after 1.1.2 for example. I
> don't think you could infer that 1.12.3 includes everything in included
> in 1.1.2 (i.e. that 1.12.3 is derived from 1.1.2). About all you could
> infer is that 1 < 12.
Which is precisely what I was after.
Cheers,
- Andreas
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|