> For version 3.9 at <http://ftp.squeak.org/>, we have Squeak3.9- 
> final-7067.zip with Squeak3.9-final-7067.image inside and  
> Squeak3.9.1-final-7075.zip with Squeak3.9.1-final-7075.image inside.  
> So 'final' in the name evidently does not mean anything.

It means something.
We should remove
	Squeak3.9.1-final-7075.image
Because there was a little glitche on it. I just forget.
So of course we forget to follow 3.8 naming convention.
Do you know how much time we spent on doing this release?

> Versions 3.10 requires version SqueakV39.sources which also is  
> confusing, 3.9 versions also require SqueakV39.sources, however,  
> versions 3.8 and below in the 3.x range require SqueakV3.sources.

3.0 is used by 3.1, 3.2,,,, 3.8.
What were the other viable solutions?

Not delivering 3.9. Fixing the source management and delay the 3.9  
release for some extra couples of months?

> And then there are the many VM's! Whew...

Why the VM are a problem.
If there are compatible. We should just create a bundle with the  
latest compatible VM.
Generally, use the latest released VM for your platform.



>
>
> Might I respectfully suggest better standardization and consistency  
> in naming conventions? All these confusing versioning issues could  
> be dealt with in improved fashion. Craig has evidently given  
> versioning some thought: <http://www.netjam.org/versions/>.
>
> Ken G. Brown
>
> At 5:00 AM -0700 4/10/08, squeak-dev-request at lists.squeakfoundation.org 
>  apparently wrote:
>> Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 06:54:42 -0300
>> From: "Edgar J. De Cleene" <edgardec2001 at yahoo.com.ar>
>> Subject: [squeak-dev] [Q] Last recommended VM for 3.10 basic ?
>> To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list
>> 	<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>> Message-ID: <C4236A32.D28C%edgardec2001 at yahoo.com.ar>
>> Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="US-ASCII"
>>
>> Folks:
>>
>> Seems I should produce the same directory structure of 3.9 release on
>> http://ftp.squeak.org/3.10/
>>
>> I ask to VM makers (John, Andreas, Ian, others) which one is the  
>> last they
>> advice should be the "official" for put into the dirs.
>>
>> Also I beg Sophie and Seaside "OneClickExperience" share with me  
>> how put the
>> needed files into the Mac VM structure for doing some OneClick3.10,  
>> could
>> email private if needed.
>>
>> Edgar
>
>
>