[squeak-dev] Mantis reports? [was: Completing the 3.10
release process]
Edgar J. De Cleene
edgardec2001 at yahoo.com.ar
Fri Apr 11 15:01:02 UTC 2008
El 4/11/08 8:28 AM, "Klaus D. Witzel" <klaus.witzel at cobss.com> escribió:
> [I'm just adding an item, not related to the issues mentioned earlier in
> this thread]
>
> What happens to the Mantis reports which are addressed/solved by the
> release process?
>
> Must they be marked as closed, others as postphoned, or even as "not
> considered by 3.10" etc?
>
> Just a thought, worth to be mentioned under this thread's subject, IMHO.
>
> /Klaus
http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/5975 "History of the 3.10 release"
In image I put a History morph, for people could have a glimpse of how
release evolved from as old as History7124.morph from 20/07/07.
Most items was marked as resolved, as was discussed in release list if my
memory don't fail me.
Some could have feedback and was reopened or marked different
More 3.10 docs in http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/5919 The 3.10 release
http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/5934 List of Mantis issues ready to be
included in 3.10 (not all here go to release for different reasons)
http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/5990 Complaints about how 3.10 is going
Here I could say "Ahora es tarde para lagrimas" :=) (too late for tears !)
Edgar
P.S. I just complete some of OS info in ftp directories as requested and
with the info I have until now.
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|