[squeak-dev] ifNotNil: takes block with one argument. Why not
ifNil:ifNotNil:?
askoh
askoh at askoh.com
Tue Apr 29 04:06:57 UTC 2008
ifNotNil: takes block with one argument. Why not ifNil:ifNotNil:? Would it be
harmful to make ifNil:ifNotNil: and ifNotNil:ifNil: take blocks with one
argument?
Thanks,
Aik-Siong Koh
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ifNotNil%3A-takes-block-with-one-argument.-Why-not-ifNil%3AifNotNil%3A--tp16952893p16952893.html
Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|
