On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 10:12 -0600, Tim Johnson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Off Topic:  Looks like there is debate stirring among the Ruby  
> community on whether to fork Ruby to experiment with parallelization,  
> etc.  Sounds awfully familiar.
> 
> http://pragdave.blogs.pragprog.com/pragdave/2008/12/forking-rubymy-rubyconf-keynote-is-now-up.html
> 
> On Topic:  A Google search for "squeak roadmap 3.11" turns up no  
> applicable results.  Is there a formal roadmap?  I am most curious  
> about what will happen to 3.10 when 3.11 is released.

Oh, I didn't get this far down the message for some reason before I
replied before.

What do you expect to happen to 3.10?  I think there must be some sort
of misunderstanding.  3.11 is a descendant of 3.10.  So barring a bug
addressing release of some kind 3.10 is basically done.

Ken

> 
> Thanks,
> TimJ
> 
> 
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20081208/f57c89ef/attachment.pgp