We need to relax a little
stephane ducasse
stephane.ducasse at free.fr
Sat Feb 2 18:00:59 UTC 2008
you can read to archive to see that I dream too about a small
kernel ....
Now some people promised too much and did too few so that I can trust
them.
Stef
> First of all, I would say, thath I appreciate your work..very much.
> I admire you, like I admire all the "Squeak's Masters".
>
> This message, is for all the community.
>
> Probably, I'm not the right person to speak, because, I'm only a
> newbie, learning this fantastic world, and I'm more an observer than
> a contributor (sad to me).
>
> I'm concerned because in all the time I'm in this list, always thath
> the team want to improve, or do some thing to the project, the
> people thath disagree, create a fork, or don't want to help.
>
> The forks are not good for any project. In spanish maillist (as all
> can say, my english is terrible, and there I can express me better),
> I said thath IMHO, the best thath Squeak can do, is to go to a
> minimal Squeak, and all the things has now, could be loaded. and I
> think all we need to do is help to this, because this, is for all.
>
> Only can express my sadness, because I'm attending how this
> community is destroyed. Why all don't help? Why all only want his
> own purposses?.This is what we want to show to the newest members? a
> selfish community? The best thing we can do, if I don't like
> something, I will see to other side?
>
> We have a board, true? This was elected by the Squeak community, and
> IMHO, the opinions of the board, could be voted by the community,
> and the community, will get a Squeak for all.
>
> The example of Traits. Some wants Traits integrated on the image.
> Other Don't want it. Ok, a poll for this, and the community may
> respect the results.
>
> Only is an opinion, and, as the mail you received, I didn't have the
> value courage to send it.
>
> This mail go with good intentions, but I don't know how express me
> better, sorry.
>
>
> El 02/02/2008, a las 16:36, stephane ducasse escribió:
>
>> Hi egdar
>>
>> to make sure that I understand that correctly: 3.10 harvested a
>> couple of fixes (compared with the 685 mantis
>> items marcus closed) and you are telling that 3.11 will in addition
>> merge everything and reconcile all the forks.
>> This sounds optimistic and not really aligned with the results of
>> 3.10. Don't you think?
>>
>> Now a couple of weeks ago someone sent me this mail
>> "Just out of curiosity...
>> I wanted to write a mail, along the lines of...
>> I looked into the bugs fixed in 3.10... I'm a bit confused, though,
>> because there does not seem to be much progress in 3.10 with
>> respect to bug fixing. Is Mantis up to date? Is Mantis showing what
>> I think it should (I used the date + status filters)?
>>
>> Below is a comparison of the number of reports for each possible
>> state in 3.9 (March 1, 2005 - Sept 30, 2006) and 3.10 (Oct 1, 2006
>> - today):
>> 3.9 3.10 status
>> ----------------------------
>> 276 254 new
>> 19 8 feedback
>> 4 1 acknowledged
>> 2 3 confirmed
>> 70 111 assigned
>> 47 10 resolved
>> 685 25 closed
>>
>> ...but I did not send it (yet)"
>>
>> And you know the saddest part is that is not that 3.10 harvested so
>> few fixes because this can happen. The saddest part is
>> that this person did not send his email because it means that
>> people get bored or at the end that we do not succeed to bring
>> their enthousiasm into the community. With this kind of attitude
>> will may lose on the long term. I like squeak because people are
>> sharing and are enthousiast about it.
>> Of course managing the image with MC does not really work for
>> streaming changes. I really hope that MC2 will solve that. Colin
>> told me that it will: MC2 will really load only the difference and
>> will not have to rescan everything. Now MC2 is not ready and may be
>> not ready.
>>
>> So I will do 3.9.1 because some people asked me and after I will
>> really take the time to think about where I put
>> my energy. May do a call for building another fork of something
>> different from Squeak as it is now or simply do not care.
>> May be other dynamic languages are more fun at the end.
>>
>> Stef
>>
>
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|