Dynamic Protocols in the Dev-images
Zulq Alam
me at zulq.net
Sun Feb 3 15:07:01 UTC 2008
stephane ducasse wrote:
>
> I also got the impression that at each doit I did the protocols got
> recomputed....arghh
>
>
You are correct. Each instance of OBCodeBrowser is registered to be
notified of all system changes. Notification triggers regeneration of
dynamic protocols.
A "do it" or "print it" is evaluated using
Compiler>>#evaluate:in:to:notifying:ifFail:logged: which triggers this
notification.
Confusingly, when you "debug it", this notification isn't sent. The code
is compiled and executed but no notification is sent.
But, if you debug something that does change the system like: "Object
compile: 'dude ^ ''sweet'''" then a notification is triggered.
I conclude that either "debug it" isn't correctly notifying or "do
it"/"print it" are sending out unnecessary notifications.
With regard to dynamic protocols, none of this should matter if it were
fast enough although it would help to reduce the number of times they
are regenerated.
Regards,
Zulq.
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|