#fork and deterministic resumption of the resulting process
Michael van der Gulik
mikevdg at gmail.com
Thu Feb 7 00:31:06 UTC 2008
On 2/7/08, Yoshiki Ohshima <yoshiki at vpri.org> wrote:
> Michael,
>
> > I think that people are now just saying rubbish to provoke a
> > reaction. I wouldn't bother replying.
>
> Wow, does this "people" include yourself? What was this email
> about?
>
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2008-February/125110.html
>
> You apologized for making a provoking comment there. Why again?
It was not intended to be a provoking comment.
>
> And yes, as Andreas wrote, I don't think you understand the problem
I understand the problem and his fix.
> BTW, you apologized for making a direct comment but didn't mention
> that claiming Andreas' code was buggy and incorrect was wrong. Is
> that still so?
Andreas is a great programmer, but the example he posted had a bug in
it and the proposed fix was incorrect.
I'll continue this discussion after I've released a stable,
multi-threaded VM in which Andreas's example breaks.
Gulik.
--
http://people.squeakfoundation.org/person/mikevdg
http://gulik.pbwiki.com/
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|