Morphs as composition of traits?

Igor Stasenko siguctua at gmail.com
Mon Feb 11 11:44:53 UTC 2008


On 11/02/2008, stephane ducasse <stephane.ducasse at free.fr> wrote:
> >>
> >
> > My personal guess is because it is not "just" another UI. Also there
> > appears to be an astonishing lack of interest.
>
> Bert I can't let you saying that. ;)
> There was an interest. I send emails to both mailing-list so that
> people talked at that time.
> You cannot use this argument. :)
>
> As for Sophie some people told me that the event system of Tweak made
> things nearly impossible to debug
> so.
>
> Then the different iv semantics (with Xml encodings) was not that nice
> (I would have prefer
> (CField name: fill ) vs <xml.....>.   Linking XML parser with class
> internal was always a problem to me. Espcially when
> you can use plain smalltalk as for declarative syntax.
> Finally having a syntax (may be based on a meta object extension of
> class definition) would be better than you be able
> to use the browser to define different kinds of instance variables.
> (At least relying on bold to represent different iv vs
> text representation was inadequate. Imagine copy and pasting code....
> and losing semantics.
>
> Igor I posted all that in the tweak mailing-list.
>
Hehe, new day, new mail list to subscribe :)
Sure, i'll take a look.

> Bert BTW I heard that in fact the tweak of Plopp and sophie were not
> the same as croquet, so it is
> true that there were forks inside tweak itself?
>
> Stef
>
>


-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list