On 22/02/2008, Andreas Raab <andreas.raab at gmx.de> wrote:
> Igor Stasenko wrote:
>  > In this respect, i think, best would be to incorporate Spoon features to VM.
>  > As i understand (Craig, correct me if i'm wrong), a Spoon VM changes
>  > are incremental and not breaking any compatibility.
>
>
> I'm not sure which changes you mean. If it's about imprinting, I'm no
>  fan of that. I don't want methods automatically transferred between
>  images - I want tools that I can use in a remote image to load and edit
>  code just like I do in the "main" image. With the end result being a
>  well-defined set of packages that are designed to work together.
>

I'm about marking oops while code running, to get a part of image
which required to run your code and scrap the rest.


-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.