Jason Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 4:01 AM, Michael van der Gulik
> <mikevdg at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I disagree about it being the right approach in the long term.
> 
> The correct mid-term approach is to do what Erlang did:  Have one
> image, and one OS-thread per *scheduler*.  Then when new processes run
> they get a particular scheduler.

What is the advantage of doing this compared to Hydra?

Cheers,
   - Andreas