beware GNU Smalltalk if you want to contribute to squeak
Randal L. Schwartz
merlyn at stonehenge.com
Wed Jan 9 17:47:22 UTC 2008
Yes. Lgpl which means we would need to relicense it to include it or
anything derived from it in the squeak core. Any chance of that
Sent from my iPhone!
On Jan 9, 2008, at 12:38 AM, Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu.org> wrote:
>> The license I see at
>> looks pretty clear:
>> * This file is part of GNU Smalltalk.
>> * GNU Smalltalk is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
>> modify it
>> * under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
>> the Free
>> * Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option) any
>> later * version.
>> Doesn't look like I can just lift part of the libs from GST and use
>> it as-is
>> in something that is not as restrictive as the LGPL.
> The license I see for kernel/Object.st also looks pretty clear:
> | This file is part of the GNU Smalltalk class library.
> | The GNU Smalltalk class library is free software; you can
> redistribute it
> | and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
> | as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2.1,
> or (at
> | your option) any later version.
More information about the Squeak-dev