beware GNU Smalltalk if you want to contribute to squeak
dz0004455 at gmail.com
Wed Jan 9 23:01:49 UTC 2008
if you really want to be "open", you should except anything from anywhere,
and licenses shouldn't matter, at least thats how i see it.
what are the major differences in the two licenses?
On Jan 9, 2008 12:04 PM, Bruce Badger <bwbadger at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 09/01/2008, Randal L. Schwartz <merlyn at stonehenge.com> wrote:
> > Yes. Lgpl which means we would need to relicense it to include it or
> > anything derived from it in the squeak core. Any chance of that
> > happening?
> If your comments only apply to "squeak core" then people not involved
> with that can happily use a mix of Squeak and GNU/Smalltalk. Is that
> Where could I find a description of "squeak core"?
> Make the most of your skills - with OpenSkills
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Squeak-dev