beware GNU Smalltalk if you want to contribute to squeak

David Zmick dz0004455 at gmail.com
Wed Jan 9 23:01:49 UTC 2008


if you really want to be "open", you should except anything from anywhere,
and licenses shouldn't matter,  at least thats how i see it.

what are the major differences in the two licenses?

On Jan 9, 2008 12:04 PM, Bruce Badger <bwbadger at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 09/01/2008, Randal L. Schwartz <merlyn at stonehenge.com> wrote:
> > Yes. Lgpl which means we would need to relicense it to include it or
> > anything derived from it in the squeak core. Any chance of that
> > happening?
>
> If your comments only apply to "squeak core" then people not involved
> with that can happily use a mix of Squeak and GNU/Smalltalk.  Is that
> right?
>
> Where could I find a description of "squeak core"?
>
> Thanks,
>    Bruce
> --
> Make the most of your skills - with OpenSkills
> http://www.openskills.org/
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20080109/36106557/attachment.htm


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list