On Jan 15, 2008, at 4:11 , Frank Shearar wrote:
> Surely it means that most of Squeak 3.10 ("most" meaning  
> "everything touched
> by a signatory since Squeak 1.1") is under the MIT licence? (Given  
> that
> http://netjam.org/squeak/SqueakDistributionAgreement.pdf mentions  
> MIT, not
> Apache 2.0.)

Correct - an Apache "base" with MIT extensions.

> If I understand correctly, if you wanted these changes included in the
> Squeak "core" (whatever that means), the changes would have to be MIT
> licenced.

Correct again.

- Bert -