On Jan 14, 2008 11:06 PM,  <squeakdev1 at reider.net> wrote:

> Maybe an absolute millisecond clock value could be used instead of
> Time millisecondClockValue, thereby abstracting the handling of
> rollover into one place.

Maybe that's what should have been done in the first place, at least
in part because it's so hard to debug such rarely-used code.

Cheers!

--Tom Phoenix