License questions.

tim Rowledge tim at
Tue Jan 15 21:15:10 UTC 2008

On 15-Jan-08, at 12:39 PM, Michael van der Gulik wrote:
> Is it possible for Squeak to be considered an "Apache base with MIT  
> extensions"? The base (Squeak 1.1 ) is obviously Apache licensed,  
> and if you made a massive changeset of all changes since then, that  
> changeset would be MIT licensed,
Nope, I don't think so. Aside from a number of people with changes in  
there that haven't yet signed the relicensing paperwork, there are  
large chunks that (probably) belong to Disney and HP. Bloody lawyers  
and big corporations...

tim Rowledge; tim at;
Strange OpCodes: RTS: Rewind Tape and Shred

More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list