License questions.

Andreas Raab andreas.raab at
Tue Jan 15 21:23:09 UTC 2008

tim Rowledge wrote:
> On 15-Jan-08, at 12:39 PM, Michael van der Gulik wrote:
>> Is it possible for Squeak to be considered an "Apache base with MIT 
>> extensions"? The base (Squeak 1.1 ) is obviously Apache licensed, and 
>> if you made a massive changeset of all changes since then, that 
>> changeset would be MIT licensed,
> Nope, I don't think so. Aside from a number of people with changes in 
> there that haven't yet signed the relicensing paperwork, there are large 
> chunks that (probably) belong to Disney and HP. Bloody lawyers and big 
> corporations...

HP? Can you point to any code that is in Squeak which you believe is 
owned by HP?

   - Andreas

More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list