License questions.

Michael van der Gulik mikevdg at gmail.com
Tue Jan 15 21:29:20 UTC 2008


On Jan 16, 2008 10:15 AM, tim Rowledge <tim at rowledge.org> wrote:

>
> On 15-Jan-08, at 12:39 PM, Michael van der Gulik wrote:
> > Is it possible for Squeak to be considered an "Apache base with MIT
> > extensions"? The base (Squeak 1.1 ) is obviously Apache licensed,
> > and if you made a massive changeset of all changes since then, that
> > changeset would be MIT licensed,
> Nope, I don't think so. Aside from a number of people with changes in
> there that haven't yet signed the relicensing paperwork, there are
> large chunks that (probably) belong to Disney and HP. Bloody lawyers
> and big corporations...
>


How do I pick out the changes made at Disney so that I can rewrite them
under MIT?

Gulik.

-- 
http://people.squeakfoundation.org/person/mikevdg
http://gulik.pbwiki.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20080116/c182076a/attachment.htm


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list