License questions.

Michael van der Gulik mikevdg at
Tue Jan 15 21:29:20 UTC 2008

On Jan 16, 2008 10:15 AM, tim Rowledge <tim at> wrote:

> On 15-Jan-08, at 12:39 PM, Michael van der Gulik wrote:
> > Is it possible for Squeak to be considered an "Apache base with MIT
> > extensions"? The base (Squeak 1.1 ) is obviously Apache licensed,
> > and if you made a massive changeset of all changes since then, that
> > changeset would be MIT licensed,
> Nope, I don't think so. Aside from a number of people with changes in
> there that haven't yet signed the relicensing paperwork, there are
> large chunks that (probably) belong to Disney and HP. Bloody lawyers
> and big corporations...

How do I pick out the changes made at Disney so that I can rewrite them
under MIT?


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list