Le mardi 15 janvier 2008 à 21:43 +1300, Michael van der Gulik a écrit :

> 
> I'm asking this because I'm about to embark on some significant
> changes to the classes in Kernel and Collections for my SecureSqueak
> project. I want the end result of this work to be released under the
> Apache 2.0 license, if possible.  These changes are scoped to Kernel,
> Collections and a handful of other classes.

You should not worry about that.
Just release your SecureSqueak -- Squeak VM + Squeak image encapsulated
-- under the Apache 2.0 license. The SqL grant you this right.
OLPC, Sophie, Croquet, ... people are doing that just fine.
I am also doing that for my pet iStoa project.

The Squeak license is more a community problem because the SqL is not
acknowledge as a free software license by the free software community.

Hilaire
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20080116/f0f05b7a/attachment.pgp