Hi juan

I know your project now I told you that several times so I repeat it  
again:
If we cannot load Morphic 3 beside Morphic 2 then really few people  
will be able to load it.
The transition phase will be difficult. So think again about it. If  
you force people to chose
then you will not gain from them. Now if I can load Morphic 3 beside  
Morphic2 then I'm sure people
may help to port elements from one to the other.
Look at the stream of Craig.

Stef

On Jan 30, 2008, at 3:01 AM, Juan Vuletich wrote:

> Hi Stef,
>
> stephane ducasse wrote:
>> http:/piumarta.com/software/cola/canvas.pdf
>>
>> BTW
>> one of these days it would be good to
>>    - identify the core of morphic (should not that be difficult)
>>    - rethink these parts
> This looks exactly what I'm doing with Morphic 3. Anybody willing to  
> do as you say is welcome to check what I'm doing, and work together.  
> I believe Morphic 3 can be the next UI framework for Squeak. Do you?
>
> To read about Morphic 3, see http://www.jvuletich.org/Smalltalks2007/St2007VuletichMorphic3TalkProposal.pdf 
>  and http://www.jvuletich.org/Morphic3/TheFutureOfTheGUI_01.html .
>> Because we need a small better done UI framework or simply  
>> implement lessphic in Squeak
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> Sure!
>
> Cheers,
> Juan Vuletich
>
>