As for me (i'm a very newbee for squeak and st), 3.10 looks more heavy
and more slow. Visual decoration and theming is very nice but i don't
know is it real cause of low performance.

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 15:21, Damien Cassou <damien.cassou at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm responsible for generating each month the squeak-dev images. They
> currently exist in 4 versions which are all downloaded a lot:
>
> - based on 3.9 (174 downloads)
> - based on 3.9 with web stuffs (158 dl)
> - based on 3.10 with beta stuffs (129 dl)
> - based on 3.10 with beta  and web stuffs (166 dl)
>
> Since 3.10 is not beta anymore, I would like to know what I have to do
> to suit your needs. It seems 3.9 based images are still used a lot. Is
> it because 3.10 based images contain beta stuffs or because people
> don't believe in 3.10 or something else?
>
> I have set-up this poll to know if I still need to base the dev-images
> on top of 3.9 and 3.10.
> Base squeak-dev images
> http://www.doodle.ch/5u67s53greapfdu6
>
> Also, I would like to know if you consider some packages still beta or
> not. Please also answer the following poll:
> Squeak-dev beta packages:
> http://www.doodle.ch/9y9r6nr2imci8g38
>
> And what about the web stuffs? Do I need to duplicate all images to
> have one version with and one without?
>
> This thread is also here to collect your remarks and comments. I would
> like to collect opinions so that future images fit most of your needs.
>
> --
> Damien Cassou
> Peter von der Ahé: «I'm beginning to see why Gilad wished us good
> luck». (http://blogs.sun.com/ahe/entry/override_snafu)
>
>