Keith Hodges wrote:
>>
> Having tried Hg, I have found Bzr to be preferable.
> 
> Hg doesnt have a lightweight checkout, Bzr does. i.e. you can deploy the 
> latest, without the whole history.
> 
> I have setup a public (ish) bzr server at bzr.warwick.st with 160Gb of 
> space. We will be using this for managing and distributing the results 
> of automated image builds in the near future.

Just trying to bring everything back to the core question:
What about having something like CPAN (with a CPAN installer) for Squeak?

I am trying to follow the discussions, but to me it seems as if this 
central question is not really discussed.

Instead, there are interesting topics, like Squeak-To-SVN, 
advantages/disadvantages of other Versioning Tools (whose names I have 
not even heard, was in ENVY/Manager, SVN and ClearCase land too long it 
seems), nameing and so on...

What about the central question?
What about having something like CPAN (with a CPAN installer) for Squeak?