On 7/5/08, Michael van der Gulik <mikevdg at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> These Namespaces are not for Squeak. They are for a fork of Squeak I'm >making, called SecureSqueak.

I'm not sure I have ever understood your use of the word "security"
here.  When I think of security (as relates to technology) I think of
firewalls, access rights and the like.  Is something like this what
you mean, i.e. that unknown users can inject code into the image but
it has no rights unless someone grants them, etc.?