[squeak-dev] Does anyone use Monticello Configurations in 3.9
or3.10?
Ron Teitelbaum
Ron at USMedRec.com
Thu Jun 26 14:54:37 UTC 2008
Hi Diane,
There are a few different fixes out there, if you check this list I believe
Philippe once posted a list of all the different fixes.
Here is mine:
http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=5217
In my opinion Monticello Configurations are essential, although I have
experienced some trouble with competing versions in different repositories.
Good luck,
Ron Teitelbaum
> -----Original Message-----
> From: squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org [mailto:squeak-dev-
> bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On Behalf Of Danie Roux
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 10:41 AM
> To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list
> Subject: [squeak-dev] Does anyone use Monticello Configurations in 3.9
> or3.10?
>
> Dear list,
>
> I've been trying to get Monticello Configurations to work, ideally in
> a 3.9 based image. I would be very interested to hear from anyone
> using it successfully in a 3.9 or 3.10 image.
>
> I take these steps:
>
> - Start with a new Squeak3.9.1-final-7075 image.
> - Open up a Monticello Configurations from the menu
> - Add Balloon-ar.13
> - Add repository http://source.squeakfoundation.org/Balloon from the list
>
> I can now hit update (from repositories), and get Balloon-ar.14. Cool,
> as expected.
>
> - I click Store, and save it as test.mcm in my local package-cache
> repository.
> - I now close everything and open a Monticello Browser again.
> - I open my package-cache repository
> - Select "test" project
> - Select test.mcm on the right pane and I get a walkback:
>
> "My subclass should have overridden #loadVersionInfo"
>
> --
> Danie Roux *shuffle* Adore Unix - http://danieroux.com
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|