Hi Peter,

 

we did a MSIL to C++ backend in our LSW DotNet Reflection-Browser some years
back. It avoided the need of C++ parser because we decompiled MSIL..

Just curious what it is for ? we introduced Smalltalk deompiler backend just
to increase readability of .NET code for Smalltalkers. 

 

Frank

 

  _____  

From: squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org
[mailto:squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On Behalf Of Peter
William Lount
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 2:40 PM
To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list
Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] C++ parser in Smalltalk?

 





 
 <mailto:peter at smalltalk.org> <peter at smalltalk.org> wrote:
  

C/C++ to Smalltalk translator anyone?
    

 
multiple inheritance, anyone? ;-)
 
Have fun,
 
Michael
 
 
  


hi,

Taking back the base technologies into the fold of Smalltalk Style Systems. 

Smalltalk and C were both designed with operating systems in mind. 

Unix had the prevailing popular OS design. 

Smalltalk Style Systems have the prevailing superior Messaging-Objects
design.

Absorb and transform ALL C/C++ code into something new jettisoning the
current bases in C/C++ with transformations into Smalltalk Style Systems.

Be license aware and appropriate of course.

Just a thought.

Now to try some cool visualizations of large C++ ick. Shivers.

Cheers,

Peter




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20080630/0c44d8ad/attachment.htm