Yes off course, but, the people out of squeak community don't see with good
eyes a platform whom don't have tools to make "Common Applications"( For me
a Morphic Application is good, but the common user have requirements like "I
wanna my name in the titlebar" )

I'm fully agree with you, and don't see any reason to pay to Cincom, but the
Facts are the Fact, and the common people yet choise VW becouse  the
application's look & feel are more "Common".

Please, don't get me wrong, I'm very happy with Squeak.....and I'm wrote
this mail because I hope It be useful
.

Regards

On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 4:07 PM, John M McIntosh <
johnmci at smalltalkconsulting.com> wrote:

> If you are going to use VW the question then is what you have to pay
> cincom if you have a commercial application
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Diogenes Moreira <
> diogenes.moreira at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > HI folks:
> >
> > In the follow mail, you can see a typical question...and answer...
> >
> > In my point of view, is very important support projects like Seaside or
> > SqueakGTK  (with Esteban Lorenzano's Approach) to make Squeak easier and
> > more interesting to Newbies and the common people, and the end, the
> > Following Question will be a Obviously answer "Squeak"
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Diogenes Moreira <diogenes.moreira at gmail.com>
> > Date: Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 2:40 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Newbies] Squeak in commercial projects
> > To: "A friendly place to get answers to even the most basic questions
> > about Squeak." <beginners at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
> >
> >
> > Hi:
> >
> > Obviously, you can.
> >
> > But, VW have tools and things to make easy the development and deploy.
> > Some thing, like UIPaint, don't have your replacement in Squeak, but I
> > don't find any stopper to develop in Squeak.
> >
> > The only point to review is this: Your application always will be in a
> > World (Squeak Enviroment),
> >
> > Here you are some tips.
> >        First Tip: make 2 images, one for development and other to
> > production. In the production Image only load your needed package. When
> > finish you development make a file out or use Monticello to export your
> > classes to you production image.
> >        Second Tip: You can package your images like Lukas Reggie do in
> > Seaside One lick.
> >        Third Tip: You can customize the UI in your application like mac
> > with Pinesoft package.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 10:08 PM, RENE PLOURDE <realpepe at mac.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Can one use Squeak to build and sell applications? My wife is a
> > > musician and has some ideas for a Music Theory Application and asked
> > > if I could build it. The choices seem to be between Squeak and
> > > VisualWorks.
> > >
> > > If one built an application with Squeak are there tools for packaging
> > > it so that you only ship executables and not the entire development
> > > environment?
> > >
> > > Thanks for any information you can provide.
> > >
> > > Rene'
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Beginners mailing list
> > > Beginners at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> > > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20080307/d9d4c2ca/attachment.htm