> Hrm, I had a look at this and while I see the license clearly says
> "LGPL" I also see that Janko is is on the core list of developers.  I
> clicked on the total list of developers and didn't see your name.

This is in favor of Bruce actually.  A contributor expects to trust what 
the site says.

> So for me this isn't totally conclusive.  What licenses could one
> indicate on a Sourceforge project back then?  Wasn't it a "(L)GPL"
> only site?

This would seem very strange to me.  At the very least a "Other" should 
be there.  Why do you say "wasn't it"?  Do you have any recollection or 
evidence of that?

Paolo