[squeak-dev] Swazoo - LGPL or MIT?
Reinout Heeck
reinz at desk.org
Tue Mar 25 10:20:17 UTC 2008
cdrick wrote:
> Just to cool down things... (I hope)
I'm cool :-)
>
>
>> I understand you have also excluded Bruce from discussions about
>> relicensing his code - how sick can you get?
>
> He didn't do that (otherwise this means he had excluded/unregister him
> from the swazoo list).
From Bruce's post I gather that is what has happened, so that may need
another look (hopefully it turns out to just be a technical issue).
>
>> I suggest you put the original licenses back up immediately, and decide
>> to stay within the law from here on if you truly want to help the
>> Smalltalk community.
>
> This is done already (http://sourceforge.net/projects/swazoo/) as he
> told me yesterday on irc. Sure he should have said that on the list.
>
> It seems this was the main point of Bruce thread so now...I hope it's
> not too late and things will cool down...
I was appalled at the direction this thread took, it seemed centered
around self-interest (paraphrasing: "we *have* to get MIT on Swazoo")
rather than the obvious conclusion that Swazoo had entered illegal
territory.
Thanks for the notice,
R
-
>
> Cédrick
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|