[squeak-dev] License info in methods stamp
giovanni
giovanni at corriga.net
Tue Mar 25 19:12:50 UTC 2008
--- "Igor Stasenko" <siguctua at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 25/03/2008, Giovanni Corriga <giovanni at corriga.net> wrote:
> > Matthew Fulmer ha scritto:
> >
> > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 06:40:48AM +0200, Igor Stasenko wrote:
> > >> A small changeset which adds a license info for each method.
> > >> http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=6993
> > >> Works in same way as user initials.
> > >>
> > >> I think it can be useful for future relicensing efforts.
> > >> With this simple patch, we will be able to easily find out, what
> > >> methods need attention.
> > >>
> > >> We can put strict limitation, that in squeak release, from now on,
> > >> only methods with stamp:
> > >> <initials> <license> <date> <time>
> > >>
> > >> accepted.
> > >> And only if <license> field is ==== 'MIT'.
> > >
> > > I think that's a great idea. I should bring this to the
> > > attention of the board. Currently, the board has issued a
> > > no-contributions-allowed policy until we can ensure that all
> > > further contributions are clearly licensed, and stop muddying
> > > the license issue even further. I think this is a perfect
> > > answer.
> > >
> >
> >
> > Wouldn't it be better to place this information at the package level?
> >
>
> This change is mainly concerning changesets , when people submitting
> fixes/extensions of separate methods in different packages.
>
The it should be the changeset, shouldn't it?
Giovanni
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|