I don't believe to be a "die hard" squeaker but one that give big
importance to the stability.

In such sense all my production projects are currently on 3.8 (and 1
or 2 on 3.7).

I don't think will invest time to migrate to 3.9, may be 3.10 or the
next one, depending of the customer needs and the improvements I need.

To my own playing I'm using mostly 3.10.

HTH.

Germán.



2008/3/28, Has van der Krieken <xs4hkr at gmail.com>:
> Hello John,
>
>  Thanks for answering that. I was suspecting that client support was a
>  main reason for backporting. I'm into Squeak and Smalltalk since
>  version 3.7. That's not so long.
>  I can't judge over the progression and improvements that Squeak has
>  made the last couple of years. When version 3.9 was released I had get
>  to used to the look-and-feel of it. I was wondering if the die hard
>  Squeakers have, for any reason, a favourite version.
>
>  Regards, Has.
>
>
>  On 3/27/08, John Magnifico <john.magnifico at gmail.com> wrote:
>  > Hi Has,
>  >
>  > 3.4 is a legacy based on a older customer we have using our software.
>  >
>  > We are in the process of migrating, but the question is what the base will
>  > be. We are very interested in Croquet as a base and also the recent work
>  > with the HydraVM. I suspect we will port to 3.8 first.
>  >
>  > We are also working on tools that will allow our software to move to any vm
>  > version. Tansel can shed further light on this later on.
>  >
>  > Cheers
>  > John
>  >
>  >
>  > On 17/03/2008, Germán Arduino <garduino at gmail.com> wrote:
>  > > Hi Has:
>  > >
>  > > May be the persons indicated to respond are Tansel or John. But I can
>  > > say that a lot of work is done on such image, with the systems of
>  > > BluePlane, but precisely the porting of Monticello is to permit
>  > > migrate more easily to newest Squeak versions.
>  > >
>  > > Cheers.
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > 2008/3/16, Has van der Krieken <xs4hkr at gmail.com>:
>  > >
>  > > > Hi Germán,
>  > > >
>  > > >  I was wondering, is there particular a reason why you or (BluePlane)
>  > > >  are still using Squeak 3.4?
>  > > >
>  > > >  Regards, Has.
>  > > >
>  > > >
>  > > >  On 3/12/08, Germán Arduino <garduino at gmail.com> wrote:
>  > > >  > Hi:
>  > > >  >
>  > > >  >  I ported a suitable version of Monticello to work on Squeak 3.4
>  > > >  >  images. This work was done to BluePlane, the Tansel Ersavas and John
>  > > >  >  Magnifico company and on their name I'm announcing this. If someone
>  > is
>  > > >  >  interested just drop a mail and I will send (or put to download) the
>  > > >  >  .cs.
>  > > >  >
>  > > >  >  Cheers.
>  > > >  >
>  > > >  >  gsa.
>  > > >  >
>  > > >  >
>  > > >
>  > > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>
>