Thanks Dave

I was more thinking that if people read my next chapter and try the  
code then Transcript show...
may break the results displayed.

Now I would love to see really integrate a stdout so that we could get  
Squeak headless
and using it as a "scripting" language. Right now on each platform we  
have to use a plugin
which is not working the same or not available on the platform.
Is there any chance that we would get

Output nextPut: 'zork'

Stef

On May 4, 2008, at 3:35 PM, David T. Lewis wrote:

> On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 10:16:48AM +0200, stephane ducasse wrote:
>> Thanks
>> I was also thinking that having a thread safe transcript would be  
>> good
>> for people trying some
>> concurrent snippets.
>>
>> Stef
>
> If you happen to be using a Unix or Mac VM, this is a more reliable  
> way to
> do it, see class OSProcess:
>
> debugMessage: aString
> 	"Print aString on standard output. The debug message is prefixed  
> with the
> 	identity of the process in which the method is being evaluated, and  
> the
> 	identity of the object which received the message. Useful for  
> debugging
> 	timing or deadlock problems."
>
> It would work on Windows too (prints to a Windows console), but I  
> have not updated
> the plugin in a long time, sorry.
>
> You can also just write to a file stream, or to a file stream on / 
> dev/tty.
>
> - Dave
>
>
>