[squeak-dev] Smalltalk images considered harmful

Randal L. Schwartz merlyn at stonehenge.com
Thu May 22 03:26:58 UTC 2008


>>>>> "Colin" == Colin Putney <cputney at wiresong.ca> writes:

Colin> Also, Andreas is right - it's probably possible to distribute Etoys
Colin> such that it can be "built" by filing "source code" into a base image
Colin> of some kind. If the base image didn't include Etoys itself (as
Colin> distinct from Squeak) that would provide the kind of transparency that
Colin> Debian is used to, at least as far as Etoys is concerned. That would
Colin> make the debian version be different from the upstream distribution,
Colin> which would presumably still be based on images.

Would they accept a KernelImage (http://www.comtalk.eu/Squeak/98)
and the rest of it as filein's?

Of course, even then, it means someone on the squeak release team would have
to tear down an image and build it back up before releasing the "official"
squeak, or we'd have to live with the idea that Debian is distributing a
slightly different image.

-- 
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn at stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list