No I don't think so.  The webteam is busy enough with www.squeak.org.
Also SqP is not implemented in Squeak at all.  SqP is the responsibility
of the box-admins team and we don't have any real need to turn it over
to someone else.

It's simply the case that if it is going to be maintained then at the
very least it is going to have to be moved, and this is frankly
something of a PITA since it is an old mod_virgule/Apache1.x
application.  It can be done certainly, but frankly I don't care to
spend the time doing it if no one cares.

The site has had very little activity in the last year, in fact only a
dozen people have posted diary entries in that time.  Most of the
articles from the last year have been my Roundups or election related
(thanks to Tim for the single real exception).

I'm not sure keeping it just for the rankings/voters functionality alone
is sufficient reason.  The fact is that it doesn't really function for
this purpose either if no one is visiting the site regularly.

Ken

On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 16:03 -0400, Ron Teitelbaum wrote:
> It's also the place to register for Squeak Leadership Team Elections.
> 
> I vote to keep it.  Can we turn it over to the Web Team to maintain?  
> 
> Ron Teitelbaum
> Squeak Elections Team Member
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org [mailto:squeak-dev-
> > bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On Behalf Of Ken Causey
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 3:17 PM
> > To: Squeak Devel List
> > Cc: Cees de Groot
> > Subject: [squeak-dev] People.squeakfoundation.org still useful?
> > 
> > Cees:  So we have at most until November 30th to either move, replace,
> > or forget people.squeakfoundation.org?
> > 
> > Community:  While Cees exaggerates a bit it is the case that only a
> > handful of us are posting to people.squeakfoundation.org lately, and
> > mostly me.  Are we, as a community, interested in maintaining this site?
> > 
> > Ken
> > 
> > On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 20:46 +0200, Cees de Groot wrote:
> > > Guys,
> > >
> > > Just discovered that apparently people.squeakfoundation.org (aka's
> > > Ken's Private Blog ;-)) is still running on my machine, and I canceled
> > > it per 30/11 because I'm hardly using it anymore.
> > >
> > > What shall we do with it?
> > >
> > > TIA,
> > >
> > > Cees
> > >
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20081014/b25a4351/attachment.pgp