Thanks, for more info:
http://www.visoracle.com/squeak/faq/sar-installer.html



Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> 
> MCZ is meant for development, not distribution. Use SAR for that,  
> which can bundle arbitrary files. .
> 
> - Bert -
> 
> Am 17.10.2008 um 04:20 schrieb askoh <askoh at askoh.com>:
> 
>>
>> Text file was just an example. But the files could be images,  
>> binaries, etc.
>> Then there are folders or directories too. A complete solution would  
>> be
>> great for testing and quality assurance in general.
>> Aik-Siong Koh
>>
>>
>>
>> Joshua Gargus-2 wrote:
>>>
>>> The quickest approach is to simply define a method that answers a  
>>> String
>>> with the test input.  Is that insufficient for some reason?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Josh
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Matthew Fulmer wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 01:24:31PM -0700, askoh wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I would like store some ordinary text files that are used as test  
>>>>> inputs
>>>>> to
>>>>> some code. How can I save a Monticello package with the test text  
>>>>> files
>>>>> together with the code? Can I do that without making the text  
>>>>> files as
>>>>> code
>>>>> in Squeak?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No. I'm pretty sure we havn't yet implemented that feature. I'll
>>>> start working on it next week or so
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Storing-non-code-files-in-Monticello-tp20016782p20026042.html
>> Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Storing-non-code-files-in-Monticello-tp20016782p20035979.html
Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.